View Single Post
Old 12-23-2010, 09:57 PM   #56
elcreative
Wizard
elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.elcreative ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,888
Karma: 5875940
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: PRS505, 600, 350, 650, Nexus 7, Note III, iPad 4 etc
Yes... you're right about your question definition... the forests used for paper are plantation forests, planted and used for trees for paper... don't need the paper, no reason for those trees... This isn't some kind of ancient forest being destroyed, these are planted and maintained to produce paper... I'm sure there is a fortune waiting for you if you can come up with an instant substitute for paper and make everybody use it... we 're still waiting for the paperless office to become a reality...


Quote:
Originally Posted by bhartman36 View Post
Excuse me if this is a dumb question, but wouldn't it be even more eco-friendly to just leave the trees alone in the first place, rather than cutting them down and growing more?
elcreative is offline   Reply With Quote