View Single Post
Old 12-23-2010, 07:02 PM   #60
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,818
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joykins View Post
I review a lot of popular fiction (romances, generally, but also other genres from time to time) as a sort of a hobby, and I find the label "bad writing" to be horribly imprecise. ...
Perhaps even badly written?

You are absolutely correct, seeing the responses here I can see that people have take "bad writing" to mean all sorts of things. I was trying to be all-inclusive. Not just grammar or plot or character but the end-result, how did the story reach the reader. I don't think it's practical to assess the quality of a novel or it's writing based on isolated criteria. The writer has to balance all the aspects to try and obtain a result. Some writers use lots of description, some almost none. Some have very complex plots, some almost none. Some go to great lengths to achieve realism, some leave lots of holes. The final result works for some readers and not for others - and (it seems to me) these latter tend to get offended and accuse the writer of poor writing.
gmw is offline   Reply With Quote