View Single Post
Old 12-17-2007, 01:23 PM   #19
Xenophon
curmudgeon
Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Xenophon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,487
Karma: 5748190
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Redwood City, CA USA
Device: Kobo Aura HD, (ex)nook, (ex)PRS-700, (ex)PRS-500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleDe View Post
Printer dpi is for pictures not for text. All of the latest stuff has photo written all over it.
When speaking about inkjet printers, you are certainly correct. I was intending to be speaking about non-color laser printers -- the sort of unit that is purchased primarily for text output. Except at the very bottom end of that market, it's hard to find a 300DPI unit. Most are either 600DPI or 1200DPI. It's also worth remembering that the original LaserWriter from Apple had a 300DPI mechanism (in 1984!)... because that was the minimum for acceptable text quality with most fonts.

So, in the market-space I intended to be describing, I most respectfully disagree. The lowest resolution laser printer I've owned in the last 23 years was that very original LaserWriter. The printer after that was 600DPI (as was the next). My current multi-year-old laser printer is a 1200DPI HP unit, available for under $500. A similar unit is a necessity for anyone who prints significant amounts of text.

Xenophon
Xenophon is offline   Reply With Quote