View Single Post
Old 12-22-2010, 08:03 PM   #658
doreenjoy
01000100 01001010
doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doreenjoy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
doreenjoy's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,889
Karma: 2400000
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: Polyamorous
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew H. View Post
Lolita was 12. You should read the book.
You beat me to it.

Lolita is quite disturbing, IIRC, because the narrator thinks of her as a child, she is a child, yet he lusts after her sexually.

Not saying it should be banned, at all. I'm a big supporter of the US Constitution's First Amendment.


Quote:
. Lolita could be the same thing. Add a few years to the main characters love interest and tell it from the pedophiles point of view, look at that, a story that doubles as a how to guide
I believe Lolita IS told from the pedophile's POV. But it's been 20 years since I read it so I'm not sure.

Humbert Humbert is overcome by guilt due to his relationship with Lolita, so the book is not supportive of pedophelia if one takes the trouble to read it. It's a tragedy.

Last edited by doreenjoy; 12-22-2010 at 08:10 PM.
doreenjoy is offline