Quote:
Originally Posted by elcreative
When someone is making claims that are based on arithmetic statements then dismissing them in a cavalier fashion, when they are the main point of the article, seems a little disingenuous. It also tends to obfuscate the actual level of China's "booming" emarket, clear facts tend to help with this sort of information... if you can't even get your figures remotely right then what does that say concerning the veracity of the conclusions...
|
Sorry, I'm afraid I don't follow you. Who is this
someone to whom you are referring? Who do you think is making claims that are based on arithmetic statements and then dismissing them in a cavalier fashion, disingenuously? I trust that you aren't referring to me, because I haven't made any claims, consequently, I don't see how I could possibly dismiss them as you say. Look, I am not claiming anything here, least of all any knowledge about publishing education e-books in China. In post #2, I simply quoted points that I found interesting. I don't claim them to be true - just interesting. If you doubt the claim(s) made by the author in his article about China's digital publishing industry then it would be useful if you were to provide some clear or hard facts of your own to substantiate your view, instead of referring readers here to, dare-I-say woolly, cross-references elsewhere.