View Single Post
Old 12-19-2010, 06:07 PM   #43
Fastolfe
Bookworm
Fastolfe makes transoceanic flights without the assistance of an airplaneFastolfe makes transoceanic flights without the assistance of an airplaneFastolfe makes transoceanic flights without the assistance of an airplaneFastolfe makes transoceanic flights without the assistance of an airplaneFastolfe makes transoceanic flights without the assistance of an airplaneFastolfe makes transoceanic flights without the assistance of an airplaneFastolfe makes transoceanic flights without the assistance of an airplaneFastolfe makes transoceanic flights without the assistance of an airplaneFastolfe makes transoceanic flights without the assistance of an airplaneFastolfe makes transoceanic flights without the assistance of an airplaneFastolfe makes transoceanic flights without the assistance of an airplane
 
Fastolfe's Avatar
 
Posts: 98
Karma: 55796
Join Date: Dec 2010
Device: Sony PRS-650
As a reasonably educated person, I tend not to take dura lex, sed lex litterally. People who do and follow the law blindly can become bastards when bastardly laws are passed.

When I have to follow a rule or a law, I want to understand why that law or rule exists, and I will follow it only if I can detect some sense some sort of logic to justify its existence, and also a sense of fairness. Since I'm not a lawyer, many laws make little sense to me, but usually I still have a feeling that whoever proposed the law did it for honest reasons, with the common good in mind - after all, laws are there to allow individuals to function in society and prevent them from making one another miserable.

As a result, my personal morals and my limited understanding of the laws I have to follow as an individual in society make me agree with, or at least accept, and more importantly follow 99% of them.

But certain laws are completely stupid, and others have lobbying, big business corruption and unfairness written all over them. The DMCA is one of them. These laws, I sit on them, and I follow my own morals instead.

In the case of ebooks, my own morals dictate that:

- I can buy a freely readable file with no strings attached, that I'm sure will be readable without hassle, and readable 20 years from now (fair to me),
- that the author be paid for his hard work (fair to him),
- that whatever copy of a book I bought remains the only copy (fair to the author).

Therefore, if I can find a legit DRM-free copy of an ebook, even more expensive, I will buy it. If I can't, I will un-DRM a DRM'ed copy, keep the DRM-free copy and junk the DRM'ed copy. If I can't even buy the DRM'ed copy because I'm in the wrong country or something, I will download an illegal copy and I will pay the author personally the full price of the book as sold in libraries (up to him to pay his publisher's share directly, following his own personal morals I suppose). If I can't even download an illegal copy, I will buy the paper book and I will scan it.

And then, I will keep those books for myself. No sharing. I'm not sitting on DRM to save money, I'm doing it to truly own what I paid for, with my own definition of "owning", not the subtle twisted BS edicted in copyright laws that are there mostly to push publishers' agendas.

Last edited by Fastolfe; 12-20-2010 at 01:57 AM.
Fastolfe is offline   Reply With Quote