Quote:
Originally Posted by catsittingstill
You have grasped the heart of the argument.
One can't censor evenhandedly; censoring arbitrarily is unfair; perhaps one shouldn't censor at all.
|
So everything is equal, and no one can exercise any judgment about what to let in and keep out, because that is somehow "censorship"? That's the heart of your argument?
I can decide what to buy, but if I own a bookstore, I can't decide what to sell? Or if I'm a publisher, and you send me a piece of dreck, do I need to publish it, because if it I don't, I'm "arbitrarily" applying standards?
This is beyond absurd.