View Single Post
Old 12-15-2010, 11:48 AM   #51
abookreader
Wizard
abookreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.abookreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.abookreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.abookreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.abookreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.abookreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.abookreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.abookreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.abookreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.abookreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.abookreader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
abookreader's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,516
Karma: 2567610
Join Date: Oct 2009
Device: Kindles - Keyboard, Fire, 2-US, iPhone, iPAD
Quote:
Originally Posted by DixieGal View Post
Please explain how a book about incest can be of any morally neutral value. Do you even understand the Godless position you are defending?
Point #1. Some of the books involved are not about incest at all.

Point #2. Nearly all of the books involved are only about the consensual activities of adult participants. There was one I saw that was older teens - a 19yo and a 17yo that I understand that many would view that one differently.

Point #3. Every book involved is a fictional story. They are fantasy books. Pretend and real are different things and different rules apply to them. An extremely high percentage of people who engage in "Pretend Play" do not act upon those fantasies in real life. Just as most people who read Murder Mysteries do not murder, most people who read sexual fantasies keep it to the pages.

Point #4. For a vast part of the world - a "Godless Position" is just fine, as they do not subscribe to a God to dictate their moral positions.
abookreader is offline   Reply With Quote