View Single Post
Old 12-14-2010, 08:00 PM   #4
markuskane
Markus Kane
markuskane is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!markuskane is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!markuskane is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!markuskane is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!markuskane is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!markuskane is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!markuskane is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!markuskane is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!markuskane is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!markuskane is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!markuskane is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!
 
markuskane's Avatar
 
Posts: 49
Karma: 50000
Join Date: Sep 2010
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notre Dame View Post
Marcus - I've just taken the time to read that review. Which bits were you thinking of using?
http://chrisscottwilson.co.uk
I wasn't sure which part of the review I'd use, but I think you're right about crediting the reviewer by name. I had the same thought as you, that the name of the newspaper following the reviewer might lend more weight to the review but I don't want to be misleading in any way.

Since you've read it, what parts might you suggest?
markuskane is offline   Reply With Quote