Thread: Symlinks? Do I *have* to use FAT?
View Single Post
Old 12-10-2010, 04:42 AM   #1
rogue_librarian
Guru
rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rogue_librarian's Avatar
 
Posts: 973
Karma: 4269175
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Device: Pocketbook Basic 613
Symlinks? Do I *have* to use FAT?
Using a PB 360 here, with quite an elaborate folder structure to organize my books. Sometimes I'd like to place a book in more than one folder. Duplicating the actual file would be silly, but a symlink would be perfect. Obviously not an opzion with FAT, however. Do I have to use FAT? I don't care about Windows compatibility.
rogue_librarian is offline   Reply With Quote