View Single Post
Old 12-06-2010, 10:22 AM   #244
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
The problem with cover as I understood it have been for old book were the publisher did not have the rights to electronically publish the cover.
It's something I was thinking about yesterday.

Up till about the mid 60's, standard practice was that a publisher commissioned a cover from and artists, and bought all rights for a single fee, including keeping the original.

In the mid-60's, an artist's rights movement emerged. Artists wanted to sell reproduction rights, but keep and possibly sell the original to a collector. They also wanted the same deal as writers: if a book gets another printing, the author gets additional royalties. If the artist's cover was reused, the artist wanted additional money, too.

I don't know offhand how ebooks affect the deal with the artist, but it's entirely possible the publisher may not have the right to use the print cover on the ebook. (They could probably negotiate the rights to use it, but it would involve paying an additional fee, and they won't want to spend the money.)
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote