I find it frustrating when a seller dictates terms to a reseller.
However, there was an explanation on this thread about how it affects the authors - how the change in price comes back and changes the amount the author receives. I don't think that's fair either.
It seems to me that a reseller should have the right to offer a discount out of the profits they would have received...but it's the reseller's choice to offer that discount. It shouldn't hurt the seller's profits unless they agree on it up-front together.
I don't know if I'm saying that well.
If Acme Corp sells a widget for $10 to BigReseller, suggesting a resale price of $20, but BigReseller sells it for $18, Acme still makes its $10. BigReseller is taking a risk, hoping that by losing $2 in an individual widget price, they'll still make more money overall, because more people will by the widgets from BigReseller at $18 than $20.
But BigReseller doesn't have the right to turn around to Acme Corp and say, "hey, I offered a coupon, so I'm only paying you $8 for your widget".
|