View Single Post
Old 12-04-2010, 11:35 PM   #14
Andrew H.
Grand Master of Flowers
Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Andrew H. ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,201
Karma: 8389072
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Naptown
Device: Kindle PW, Kindle 3 (aka Keyboard), iPhone, iPad 3 (not for reading)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocgforme View Post

...Then again, some overly-certified "experts" formally changed the plural of octopus to 'octopuses', simply to make spelling "easier". Let's gut the perfectly valid, Latin-based, LOGICAL format for singular and plural nouns, just because our colleges have turned out two generations of teachers who don't *know* the rule, rather than REALLY fix the problem.
No, no, NO! It's Greek, it's not Latin. Octopuses has always been correct, and "octopi" has always been wrong. (It's hypercorrection, from people thinking that the "-us" is from a masculine Latin verb forming its plural by "-i". But it doesn't have a Latin root at all.

Platypuses is also correct, for the same reason.

Something really objectionable, IMO, is the NY Times writing "millenniums" for "millennia". That really grates...
Andrew H. is offline   Reply With Quote