View Single Post
Old 12-03-2010, 01:30 AM   #4
rogue_librarian
Guru
rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rogue_librarian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rogue_librarian's Avatar
 
Posts: 973
Karma: 4269175
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Europe
Device: Pocketbook Basic 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMSmillie View Post
... that even when it's the authors themselves seeking greater control over the price of their own books, not everyone here is in favour. I'm interested to know why that is?
It's bad for consumers, usually considered anti-competitive and clearly forbidden with most other products (where you'll commonly find a manufacture-suggested (!) retail price). In Europe we've had that model for decades (the publisher setting a price that nobody must undersell), with the clear understanding that it stifles competition (but they found that special treatment was warranted for books).

Quote:
There would, surely, still be possibilities for competition between retailers, with resulting benefits for consumers?
Not based on price, though, which is what matters to most people and is most easily compared (the product being the same).
rogue_librarian is offline   Reply With Quote