View Single Post
Old 12-07-2007, 03:22 AM   #116
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
"Tim Nation"? The Daleks were invented by TERRY Nation.

I'm sorry, but I continue to disagree with you. Reproducing the illustrations in a book is simple copyright violation and is a completely different situation from reproducing a photograph of an item created with the full permission of the trademark holder.

Your claim is analogous to saying that the Ford Motor Company could sue you for publishing a photograph of a Ford car that you'd taken yourself. I am not "using the Dalek brand" any more than you'd be "using the Ford brand" by taking a photo of your Ford car and using that photo to help you sell it.

It would be a breach of Ford's copyright if you were to reproduce one of their photographs to help you sell your car. It's fine to take your OWN photograph of a Ford and reproduce that. That's exactly what I'm doing.

You seem to be getting copyright and trademark issues horribly mixed up here.

If a representative of "Tim Nation's" estate asks me to stop using the photograph then I will happily do so. Unless or until that happens, I shall continue to use it because I believe that my use is perfectly legitimate.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote