Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Fitzgerald
For those of you still hung up on the folder/filename system, take a look at this for an example of what the future of data management/organization is bringing (a principle calibre is already more or less using). |
Right here and now, in the present, my OSs both uses folders to organize stuff.
As such, i need folders to be clean. Not messed with. It is possible to use tags collection and all, without messing with folders structure. I've never seen a music player forcing me to put mp3 in this or that folder...
Eowyn, I started out on your side, at least as far as making calibre work for you goes. One person has changed that: you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EowynCarter View Post
Organising files is just as important as organising book.
The people who built calibre disagree. They think organizing books is more important than organizing files, just like organizing files is more important than organizing disc sectors.
Quote:
|
I'm beginning to wonder if there actually is some significance to the fact that people who demand changes in how calibre works are, nearly always, rude, insulting, and confrontational. There are exceptions, but not many.
|
Ok, re-read my first post. Was I being confrontational, insulting Kovid or anything ?
Then you go "Bha, who care about your ideas, it's bad, just adapt to calibre, you're being an idiot by being unable to adapt." If you insult people so, don't be surprised if they insult you back.
I want calibre to be improved, that's why i'm demanding changes. Being able to have our way with how how the library is organized would be a BIG improvement.