View Single Post
Old 11-30-2010, 09:27 AM   #204
boxcorner
»(°±°)«
boxcorner ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boxcorner ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boxcorner ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boxcorner ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boxcorner ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boxcorner ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boxcorner ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boxcorner ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boxcorner ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boxcorner ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.boxcorner ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
boxcorner's Avatar
 
Posts: 826
Karma: 775629
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: divisive reader
Apropos of this discussion, I found the (now rather old - 4 November 2010) article by David Pogue in Scientific American, quite interesting: The Trouble with E-Readers

"This past summer Amazon made a shocking announcement: for the first time (and ever since), it sold more electronic books than hardcover ones. Now, that headline should have had half a page of footnotes. Amazon provided only the relative proportions of sales, not the actual quantities. It didn’t mention that its e-books of most best sellers cost a flat $10, compared with, for example, $25 for the same book in hardback. And it didn’t say anything at all about paperback sales (which sell the most of all)."

Last edited by boxcorner; 11-30-2010 at 02:08 PM.
boxcorner is offline   Reply With Quote