Thread: DRM = BAD
View Single Post
Old 12-06-2007, 11:36 AM   #44
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate the great View Post
I think it is still copyright infringement. The name, image, and concept "Dalek" is copyrighted, and the copyright is held by the BBC (or someone). The guy who built it for you might not own the copyright of those images.
No, you are mixing up trademarks with copyright.

You could go and take a photograph of a Ford car, and do whatever you wish with that photograph - it is your photograph. Taking a photograph of a Ford car does not require the permission of the Ford Motor Company; it is not like trying to build your own car and sell it under the name "Ford".

My avator is a photograph of a specific Dalek. I am not claiming that I own any rights to the name "Dalek"; neither am I trying to sell Daleks. It is a photograph of a model Dalek, which was built with the full permission of the trademark holder for Daleks (Mr Nation's estate and the BBC), and the photograph is reproduced with the full permission of the photographer.

I trust that that clarifies the matter!
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote