View Single Post
Old 11-28-2010, 01:06 PM   #5
EowynCarter
Wizard
EowynCarter ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.EowynCarter ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.EowynCarter ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.EowynCarter ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.EowynCarter ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.EowynCarter ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.EowynCarter ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.EowynCarter ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.EowynCarter ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.EowynCarter ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.EowynCarter ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,337
Karma: 4000000
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Paris
Device: Cybooks; Sony PRS-T1
Quote:
What you need or don't need has nothing to do with the internal structure of calibre. At the risk of repeating myself, You do not need to change calibre's library structure.
Calibre library structure prevent me from using it. So yes, i would need to change it, if I'm to use calibre.

Quote:
Calibre provides a clean library. It isn't possible to address everyone's unique OCD symptons.
Clean ?? Not really, it totally un-browable.
And of course it is possible to accommodate everyone, by adding the function that already exists in "save to folder" and "send to device". Let the user say how to name the files.

Quote:
It is possible calibre isn't for you, but I or others here could create an acceptable workflow to accomplish even your unique view.

One idea is to create 3 libraries. One for your source files, a second for your working files, a third for finished files. Books can be copied from one library to the next library at any stage.
Mmm, no go. Some books have one files, others have 3 or 4.
Unless I have Calibre handle only the "final" files, but having to manually sort the rest would defeat the point of a library software.
EowynCarter is offline   Reply With Quote