Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Fitzgerald
At this point, based on this post of yours, I'm convinced you don't care and are just using it as an opportunity to further harrass me because the truth about your arrogance hurts (and, at this point, ignorance can be added to the list). Otherwise, what would be the purpose of dredging up references to my bookscanning?
|
I see I've made my point
- you're already at the "ad hominem rant" stage. Suffice to say that I take no pleasure arguing with a chessboard flipper - nor is there any intent to harass - I'm not responsible for your persecution fantasies
. If I see logical abuse, I'll point it out. Don't like it? Stop doing it or
simply admit it's your personal opinion instead of pretending it is objective fact and I'll be happy to leave it alone. But more importantly,
if you can't take it, don't dish it out. "Harrass" indeed
. Gimme a break.
As for "dredging up references" - the thing about the internet is that it never forgets
. Don't be surprised if blatant inconsistency between threads is rewarded with references to past arguments. I have neither the time nor the patience to repeat myself when the text is all right there, just waiting to be cited. Besides, I'm merely following your past advice to search for old threads because it's all been argued before (sound familiar?
).
Well, I think I've saved everyone here at least two days of arguing into the void by getting you to the inevitable "whatever" stage much earlier than usual. It was a warning to the others that you have a history of not arguing in good faith and of not admitting mistakes.