Quote:
Originally Posted by Theeo123
if it's not do-able, that's fine I'm not here to raise a stink and go "oh noes" or whatever
I was just hoping there was a way to get it to do what I wanted, if there isn't, there isn't I'll eat the extra 60 gig, but I figured I'd ask before I fragment the crap out of my drive :P
|
For what it's worth: We've seen a repeat of this exact same discussion, many times with the OP being quite... adamant that his way is the right and only way, many times over- in fact, it's a recurring theme around here. (This is not to say that you are one of those annoying know-it-alls who usually post that request, before you get confused. I found your posts to be civil and not as stubborn as they could have been
) So, if someone, and be it with the best of intentions, repeats the request, people tend to react a bit more aggressive and/or annoyed than they usually would.
Also, while any change to the calibre database structure should certainly be implementable, it would, I gather, necessate an almost complete rewrite of certain parts. And the developer(s) picked one philosophy of doing things, and that is the way it is now.
Edit: Oh, and I'm glad the content server worked out that well for you.