Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TadW
Note that they intentionally referred to smallest "PDA phone", meaning a smartphone which at the same time runs a true PDA OS (Windows Mobile 2003 SE).
|
True true... it is this same "logic" that you see and hear in automotobile advertisements exclaiming:
"Voted #1 best in its class!"
When in fact, its the ONLY one in its class, because of some quirk that stops it from being included in any other class.
Interesting phone though, but not something I'd use, even if it were a non-flipphone.
I don't see any functional use in the Microsoft Windows that is included in many phones these days. Symbian blows Microsoft's version out of the water in both speed, functionality, and driver support for integrating with many external devices, than the current Microsoft version shipping on current "SmartPhone" devices.
To be a truly useful device, you should never know, or care, what OS the device is running, as long as it works. Do I care that my microwave is running an embedded version of Linux? (it does!) No. It does the jobs required of it. The same goes for my embedded routers and switches (also Linux).
I don't interact with the OS, unless something goes wrong and I have to fix it. If it just works, the OS should be completely transparent and anonymous.
The real reason people seem to care, is when it can't interface with their other devices and systems. It is at that point, that you realize certain protocols, file formats, or other layers are proprietary to one vendor or another's environment, and you have to "open the hood" to figure out how to make it work right.