View Single Post
Old 11-20-2010, 07:35 AM   #464
eric11210
Addict
eric11210 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eric11210 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eric11210 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eric11210 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eric11210 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eric11210 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eric11210 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eric11210 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eric11210 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eric11210 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eric11210 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 295
Karma: 400001
Join Date: Aug 2010
Device: Sony Reader PRS-600
Quote:
Originally Posted by penartur View Post
I've also never heard of it before, but doesn't it easily applies to any material with pornographic elements if the court wants so?
The argument against ordinary pornography fails based on the second part of the test. The community standards cannot be applied because it can be demonstrated that a number of people in the community partake of pornography. It was decided in a Supreme Court case on the subject.
eric11210 is offline