View Single Post
Old 11-14-2010, 09:42 PM   #35
Xenophon
curmudgeon
Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Xenophon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Xenophon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,487
Karma: 5748190
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Redwood City, CA USA
Device: Kobo Aura HD, (ex)nook, (ex)PRS-700, (ex)PRS-500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensualPoet View Post
I seriously doubt if any casual sci-fi ebook buyer has ever heard of Baen. They have heard of Amazon if they own a Kindle, and the bookstores of B&N, Sony or Kobo if they have those respective store devices, as well as Amazon which they know they cant buy from. But Baen? A non-starter in the mainstream.

This says nothing about Baen's quality ... but says volumes about "purchase intent" among eReader owners. And therefore low impact on a mainstream list like New York Times.
If they are a casual SF buyer (ebook or otherwise), they probably don't notice which publisher the books come from in the first place. On the other hand, take a walk through the SF section of your local bookstore, and see what fraction of the books have a Baen logo on the spine. I think—although I may well be wrong—that you'll find that they are the 2nd biggest SF/Fantasy publisher (after Tor's various imprints). All of which means approximately nothing when compared with total eBook sales through Amazon.

As for the "mainstream" bestseller lists (like the NYT) -- remember that they are created via a "proprietary" survey of an undisclosed group of bookstores. There's long been reason to believe that the included bookstores sell, shall we say, a rather different mix of books than what you'd get from cash register data (from all the various bar-code scanners in stores). I've certainly heard some authors and publishers with books on the NYT extended list complain that the barcode-scan-based data showed their book selling more than 2x as many copies as the bottom couple of books on the NYT non-extended list. They just weren't making those sales in "the right bookstores."

This effect showed up quite a while ago in other markets. When the record business switched from survey-style data collection to barcode based data collection, they suddenly discovered that country music outsold good old rock and roll by a substantial margin. Even though the survey-based data had been saying otherwise for years. Seems likely that the same effect may be going on in the book bestseller lists too.

Xenophon
Xenophon is offline   Reply With Quote