I am perfectly willing to explain my position.
I admit I am overly sensitized about this issue and apologize for any misunderstanding that may have caused.
My comment about "The Will of the People" was originally in response to another poster using it. I simply meant that most of us agree that child molestors are evil.
My point has been that if child molestors and their advocates are comfortable enough in today's society to actually try to publish a guide to their perversion, then something has obviously gone wrong.
I strongly feel that such a work should not be allowed to exist because it has no redeeming moral, historical or artistic value. That it indicates a clear disregard for the law and the rights of children to live without fear.
When I made that statement, I was basically told that it would lead to a domino effect, one that would apparently end in mass book burnings, the end of Freedom of Speech and the collapse of Liberty.
I honestly don't see the connection.
All I am trying to say is that it is obvious that more needs to be done to contain and eradicate this evil. Period.
I have no ulterior motive beyond that.
I never believed you were supporting child molestors.
I thought you believed I trying to dismantle Freedom of Speech as a whole.
I hope I have been able to explain my position and cleared the air.
I accept your apology without reservation.
Just so you know, the applause was from a victim who was told she can't post wanting a molestor killed. I was supporting her right as a victim to say it.
If you need further clarification, just let me know.
|