Quote:
Originally Posted by Penforhire
If someone abused my son after reading this book I would blame the abuser. The path to blaming a book is far too slippery a slope. I refuse to censor content in this way. I fully agree this was not government censorship, merely private, by Amazon. I am disappointed they caved..
|
Please see the excellent point made in an earlier post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piper_
The most dangerous element is the convincing of other pedophiles, and even putting doubts in people's minds, that it is a matter of love and pleasuring the child, and does no real damage.
The author, as many do, likes to distinguish between loving "pedosexuality," which he says is good, and molestation, which he considers bad, like rape.
The problem is that, while force is terrible and has its own repercussions, it lacks the element of self-guilt.
The whole nice, loving, "you love me, I love you, and I'm just making you feel good - doesn't it feel good?" approach does a horrendous mind job on the victim for whom it does feel good, as the guilt and confusion never goes away for so many.
|
This is where a book like this has the potential to be extremely damaging, not in inciting the act, but in further harming the victim.