View Single Post
Old 11-11-2010, 06:13 AM   #13019
nohmi2
Pensively observing.
nohmi2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nohmi2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nohmi2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nohmi2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nohmi2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nohmi2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nohmi2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nohmi2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nohmi2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nohmi2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nohmi2 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
nohmi2's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,758
Karma: 12675456
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Varied.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TGS View Post
Not at all, prurient, objectionable exploitative material should be dealt with and responded to to as prurient, objectionable exploitative material. I want such material not to be produced. However, that I want such material not to be produced does not give me any more right to outlaw its production than the prurience of Barbara Cartland gives me a right to ban that.

Censorship is dangerous - and I know pædophilia is dangerous, but then deal with those dangers through sexual offences legislation, not through censorship.
And the Sexual Offences Legislation is working wonderfully, isn't it?

I have given my opinion regarding this subject, now I will find it interesting to see how this subject is now handled, as I have said what I came on here to say.

As one radio broadcaster in Australia, who went to jail for 'outting' a paedophile used to ask when closing his program,

"Who is looking after the children?"

I salute Derry Hinch. A man of courage, and there are not many left of today.

Cheers.
nohmi2 is offline   Reply With Quote