|
Given that the PB people here have been insisting in the PDF abilities of the thing, including videos like:
The fact that their supposedly "paid-for" review does outright ignore one of the most touted features lead me to a certain crossroad:
1) The review is not "paid by" Pocketbook, but rather an independent one with certain weird criteria;
2) Pocketbook's marketing department should be fired, because they're hiring someone to praise the machine and the sodding someone ignores one of the points that the marketing people stress most.
3) The PDF abilities are so bad that they've devolved from the first Pocketbook bunches, where they are quite good and probably superior to the rest of the comparable devices, so the "paid for" reviewer tries to ignore them and see if they can get away with that.
I'd stick by the first one.
|