View Single Post
Old 11-05-2010, 07:53 PM   #7
Format C:
Guru
Format C: ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Format C: ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Format C: ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Format C: ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Format C: ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Format C: ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Format C: ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Format C: ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Format C: ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Format C: ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Format C: ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 753
Karma: 1496807
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Third World
Device: iLiad + PRS-505 + Kindle 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsem View Post
I did the above test. Kindle imposes 20 pixel margins on left/top/right; 25 pixels are used on the bottom by the progress panel and some additional margin there. So the display area is exactly 560 x 755.

If the 600x800 screen is 3.5" x 5.25", then the PDF viewing area is 3.5*560/600 by 5.25*755/800, or about 3.27" x 4.95".

At some point, I'd like to generate a PDF picture portfolio where the image dimensions are 560x755 and/or 1120x1510, and verify that all of the pixels get displayed without any rescaling artifacts.
Thank you very much, tomsem!



560x755 @ 167 DPI means 3,35 in (8, 52 cm) x 4,52 in (11,48 cm).

I'll go for this size.
The test will be a couple of pages with 1 pixel lines (see attachment).
I'll try it on the Kindle, and I'll post here the result.

At the end I'll also post the template, just in case...

Attached Files
File Type: pdf K3 Test.pdf (193.0 KB, 454 views)
Format C: is offline   Reply With Quote