View Single Post
Old 11-04-2010, 10:55 AM   #51
ATimson
Evangelist
ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ATimson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ATimson's Avatar
 
Posts: 456
Karma: 1044878
Join Date: Apr 2009
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhadin View Post
No one in my household ever watches any sporting event, yet we can't choose to reduce our cable bill by not receiving the sports channels. Eliminating them alone should reduce the bill by at least a third.
And then the pricing on your other channels would go up, as other people similarly opted out of them; same costs over less users = higher price. A la carte sounds like a great idea, and frankly I'd like to see it tried, but it's not necessarily going to save users anything.
ATimson is offline   Reply With Quote