View Single Post
Old 11-23-2007, 04:00 PM   #24
CCDMan
*****
CCDMan shares his or her toysCCDMan shares his or her toysCCDMan shares his or her toysCCDMan shares his or her toysCCDMan shares his or her toysCCDMan shares his or her toysCCDMan shares his or her toysCCDMan shares his or her toysCCDMan shares his or her toysCCDMan shares his or her toysCCDMan shares his or her toys
 
Posts: 335
Karma: 5759
Join Date: Mar 2006
Device: *****
Quote:
On this forum, so far, about 50% of the participants in the poll I set up do re-read books.
I do as well, but what percent of those we own are ever re-read? Not a large percent, I suspect (are there any numbers on this?). The idea that one somehow should keep all the books one reads is just silly. All of us have read books that we wish we had not bothered with, much less keeping to read again.

Quote:
How do you know what book you want to use 10 years later?
I may not know which ones I want to read again but you have to be an idiot not to know which ones you DON'T want to read again. Those are the ones that wind up in a landfill or passed on to somebody with different tastes. Of course, if one thought the book stunk, why would you pass it on to a friend?! <g>

Quote:
Also there are different type of readers and different kind of uses of a book.
Some books (the stinkers mentioned above) are good for leveling tables, I guess. <g> Like everything else, some books just not very good (or the economic version of that - not very popular), and although a few people might find them worthwhile, that may not be enough to waste natural resources on or for a publisher to take a chance on.

Consider books that do not sell even close to the numbers printed. How many of those wind up in the recycle bin back at the publishers? Far better for these books to be in ebook form. Not only will more of these small audience books actually make it to market (less risky to publish), but few resources are wasted if they flop.

Quote:
The argument that just because you cannot see a reason to do something does not mean that this something is worthless or not important.
Exactly where did I say that? Reading is fine but not quoting what you read between the lines.

Last edited by CCDMan; 11-23-2007 at 04:29 PM.
CCDMan is offline   Reply With Quote