View Single Post
Old 10-28-2010, 04:37 AM   #47
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSun View Post
Why is it acceptable to have a dedicated eink reader, but a company can't make a dedicated LCD reader? How many of you paid $399 for your first Kindle? Unless a high quality reader has tons of tablet features it isn't a good deal? I'll gladly pay $250 for this thing. Even if it can only be used as a reader. So far, it looks like it can do quite a bit more, but if I want to surf the web or play with applications I just pull out my netbook.
You have dedicated eInk readers because eInk isn't suitable for much else, the refresh rate is too slow and it is black and white only. It isn't a deliberate decision, but a hardware limitation. What would the benefit be of limiting an LCD device to reading only? If you don't want to surf the web, don't.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote