View Single Post
Old 10-26-2010, 07:03 AM   #234
Lady Fitzgerald
Wizard
Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Lady Fitzgerald ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Lady Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,013
Karma: 251649
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tempe, AZ, USA, Earth
Device: JetBook Lite (away from home) + 1 spare, 32" TV (at home)
Quote:
Originally Posted by orwell2k View Post
Not really a grammar gripe, rather a word usage gripe. And I know English is a 'living' language contantly evolving, but do we really need new past-tense words like 'lighted'? I have read numerous books with statements like:

He lighted the cigarette...
It was a well-lighted street...

What happened to lit? I'm sure it should be 'he lit a cigarette' and 'it was a well-lit street' - or am I going crazy?
Actually, lighted goes back to the 12c.
Lady Fitzgerald is offline   Reply With Quote