Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Fitzgerald
Talk about rhetorical tricks. Either that is what you are employing or you completely missed my point. Your post was so poorly constructed I had no clue what you were talking about.
|
Well, I can't dumb it down any further. We appear to be at an impasse
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Fitzgerald
And apparently you also have comprehension problems since I never said anything wasn't debatable. I asked what it was you considered to not be debatable.
|
*sigh* at least read your own words if not mine
. Here it is:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Fitzgerald
You have lost me here. First, what is debatable here? [emph. mine.] There is only one exemption to DMCA that allows breaking DRM on an e-book: that is to allow the read-aloud function of a reader work but only if there is a copy already available that would permit that. It's a very narrow exemption.
|
Unless that was meant to be a variation of standard English that I'm not familiar with ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Fitzgerald
As far as exemption #6 goes, it seems pretty clear to me. There was an entire thread on here. Look it up.
The rest of what you wrote is so full of misquoting, quoting out of context, wandering off topic, etc, I'm not even going to waste time trying to sort it out [emph. mine]. I don't mind arguing with someone with signs of intelligence but you? I think not.
|
In other words - "nana nana nana, I can't hear you"
Golly gee wilkies, there
are more graceful ways to back out of an argument ya know?
Oh well, it was fun while it lasted.
Oh and "misquoting, quoting out of context"?
If you take all your quotes from my post and lay them one after the other without changing order or adding anything, you will recreate your ENTIRE POST minus the last two sentences (only because I got bored by that point)
. Now I've seen everything!
"Misquoting". OMG - thanks for that belly laugh
.