View Single Post
Old 10-24-2010, 07:42 PM   #94
charleski
Wizard
charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,196
Karma: 1281258
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLeighs View Post
I hate it. Maybe I'm old-fashioned
Little, Brown turned down Norman Mailer's The Naked and the Dead because it contained too much swearing. It eventually got published with [profane language edited by moderation] changed to 'fug'.

That was 1948 - so yeah, you're a bit old-fashioned.

It's hard to imagine how you'd write a novel about an Army unit in active combat without using a lot of swear-words. They're a part of the language and play an important role in setting the tone of the scene.

I'm sure there are some writers who use gratuitous profanity as a crutch, but that's just bad writing, and there are lots of bad writers out there. Personally, I'm more offended by poor grammar and sentence construction, but I don't think books should have stickers saying 'PG-15: Author ends phrases with a preposition and uses run-on sentences'.

Last edited by dreams; 10-24-2010 at 08:10 PM. Reason: profane language edited by moderation - see moderation posted reminder in post above.
charleski is offline   Reply With Quote