View Single Post
Old 10-23-2010, 08:52 PM   #33
curstpriest
Confused
curstpriest shares his or her toyscurstpriest shares his or her toyscurstpriest shares his or her toyscurstpriest shares his or her toyscurstpriest shares his or her toyscurstpriest shares his or her toyscurstpriest shares his or her toyscurstpriest shares his or her toyscurstpriest shares his or her toyscurstpriest shares his or her toyscurstpriest shares his or her toys
 
curstpriest's Avatar
 
Posts: 402
Karma: 5538
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bay Area
Device: Kindle DXG
I seriously doubt 300 dpi ever becoming a reality. It's just really hard for most people to even notice that, even going from 150-200 is pushing it if you are looking at something >1ft from your face.

Kind of like the whole debate videophiles have with going over 24/30 fps, demanding 60.. 85.. 125.. like their eyes can even register the change (they can't)
Common ground has to be met here somewhere.

Also when you deal with older people, or with simpler media where either the senses decline or the media is low resolution anyways (most pdfs use raster images, but i guess you could use high DPI fonts/vector graphics, but still you won't really notice them, and you can anti alias low-res fonts with a few shades of gray effectively)

I'd honestly like to see color, because news/textbooks/technical manuals make use of it effectively. But that is going to take some while and I assume that when it comes it will be weak =(
curstpriest is offline   Reply With Quote