The argument that seems to be being made is that DRM is a matter of "Terms of Sale".
Generally, a seller's control over what they sell and the conditions of sale end once
payment has been made and accepted. Of course the actual arguments in court
would not be made along these lines, but more that the act of removing the DRM is
in aid of a violation (the piracy) and must be in itself prohibited. It is part in parcel
with other legal fantasy like "Guilty" property, that can be arrested, without there
ever having been a crime proven to have taken place.
Luck;
Ken
Last edited by Ken Maltby; 10-23-2010 at 05:52 PM.
|