View Single Post
Old 10-22-2010, 04:42 PM   #18
TomF
Kindle Enthusiast
TomF once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.TomF once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.TomF once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.TomF once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.TomF once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.TomF once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.TomF once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.TomF once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.TomF once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.TomF once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.TomF once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.
 
TomF's Avatar
 
Posts: 243
Karma: 1818
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Device: Kindle 3G Graphite, Kindle Fire
I think that the primary reason that Amazon is doing this is to feature-match B&N, even though this "feature" is pretty lame. If they really wanted to best B&N in this particular area then they'd allow lending for 21 days (like a library) or multiple times, to different people.

I agree that the 14-day lending period is probably designed to encourage more book sales from people who don't finish the book in 14 days. But I think that if they really wanted more book sales from lending, they should allow lending multiple times, maybe up to some limit. For every person that an e-book is lent to that doesn't finish the book there is another possible book sale.

IMHO this looks more like following B&N's lead than a really well thought out plan. It makes Amazon look weak by following rather than leading.

Personally, I'd rather see EPUB support than lending.
TomF is offline   Reply With Quote