View Single Post
Old 10-21-2010, 10:50 PM   #13
wallcraft
reader
wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
wallcraft's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,977
Karma: 5183568
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mississippi, USA
Device: Kindle 3, Kobo Glo HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by jphphotography View Post
That's not actually correct, the act of breaking "digital locks" is illegal regardless of what the intent is. I'm not saying I like DRM or agree with it, just trying to clarify the info given to the OP.
Not, for example, in the case of explicit anti-circumvention exemptions, where it definitely is legal to break the locks but it is still illegal to write the software to do so. In the case of other fair uses, the law is less clear and has never been tested in federal court against an individual.
wallcraft is offline   Reply With Quote