Thread: Seriousness In science we Trust.
View Single Post
Old 10-20-2010, 06:58 PM   #88
WT Sharpe
Bah, humbug!
WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WT Sharpe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
WT Sharpe's Avatar
 
Posts: 39,072
Karma: 157049943
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis, iPad Pro, & a Samsung Galaxy S9.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manichean View Post
Preamble: Although (or maybe because ) I'm studying to be a physicist, I'm far from being an expert on this.
Intuitively and without having a look at the math involved, I'd guess that, since no information is permitted to escape the black hole, the entanglement would break the moment one of the particle passes across the event horizon.
That's fascinating, because, to my mind, if entanglement does hold, it presents the possibility that at least some information could be had about what's inside a black hole. I can't conceive of a way to discover experimentally if that's the case, however. As I understand it, entanglement isn't subject to distance, but I have no idea about how gravity could affect it.
WT Sharpe is offline   Reply With Quote