View Single Post
Old 10-20-2010, 04:29 PM   #11
theducks
Well trained by Cats
theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
theducks's Avatar
 
Posts: 31,123
Karma: 60406498
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Central Coast of California
Device: Kobo Libra2,Kobo Aura2v1, K4NT(Fixed: New Bat.), Galaxy Tab A
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobcdy View Post
Theducks
For some reason, now the </p>s+ works with Sigil regex. Thanks for the patient help! But now my problem is that Sigil always creates new and numerous errors by inserting meaningless "corrections" in my partially completed html when imported into Sigil. It looks like I can't use Sigil at all for the html document, but must complete it correctly before opening the html in Sigil. Thus I need to use Notepad++ or equivalent, but notepad++ won't find </p>s+ or n+ or r+ It would be nice if there were a way to turn off the "corrections" in Sigil.
Sigh....
Bob
Sigil only fix things that are wrong (as in incomplete ).


That means that everything must be "enclosed" in the proper tags (a good example is Sigils blank stater page All the basics are there.).

Work from the Middle, out. By that, I mean always place the opening and closing tags (sort of like when you use some of the advanced features in this forum)
Sigil will never have to guess where the closing tag belongs. (Spans and Div's can really turn into a mess if you leave one unbalanced.
theducks is offline   Reply With Quote