[PKFFW]

Originally Posted by kennyc

I'd love to hear them as well.

Certainly in the popular/public/news media there is spin and trickery etc. But there have been very few cases of outright bias or fraud in the peer-reviewed journals and the few times it has happened it has been revealed and dealt swiftly.

Maybe he is referring to this sort of thing:

http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/54893/

http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~wstarbuc/Writing/Prejud.htm

and a whole raft of google results:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=...=1&oi=scholart

Didn't some British organisation recently admit to massaging results, including flawed data or omitting good data they didn't like, defrauding the peer review process and a bunch of other questionable things with regards to climate change science?

Mind you, I'm not arguing against climate change.

Cheers,
PKFFW