Quote:
Originally Posted by beppe
Kenny, i realize that i made a blunder in my post. Not for the content but for the form. Instead of making my point in an open form. and explaining it in detail, i just dropped hints, and put the key to it in the last reference.
Why? It is also a professional deformation and the high esteem in which I hold you that brings me to just hint at things, and avoid being graphical.
I should have said clearly that the problem is not the scientists or the science but the information processes around them. The reference to the Dean is unfortunate as it refers to Jonathan Swift, but could be interpreted at the light of recent discussions about religion.
So accept my apologies.
|
NP. As I said this is a topic worthy of discussion, but let's keep it on target as requested by the "serious" tag. And certainly the scientific (peer reviewed) press as well as the popular press and media are both worthy of discussion but let's be clear about which we speak.
