View Single Post
Old 10-16-2010, 10:35 AM   #18
mish
Addict
mish ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mish ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mish ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mish ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mish ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mish ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mish ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mish ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mish ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mish ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mish ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mish's Avatar
 
Posts: 215
Karma: 1930065
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Device: PRS-350, Kindle 2
Well, I guess I'm in the minority opinion here, but I don't see anything wrong with an author giving themselves a rating or review as long as they clearly identify themselves as the author of the work. I see this on goodreads all the time. Some authors use this as a way to convey more information about the book, and some just say, "Hey, it's my book, of course I love it!" or something like that (Actually, I'd be worried if they said they didn't like it!). I see it as akin to a politician being allowed to cast one vote for themselves. I think authors should be able to give themselves one vote too.

If an author pretends to be someone else to leave shill reviews then that is totally different and unacceptable.
mish is offline   Reply With Quote