View Single Post
Old 10-14-2010, 04:42 PM   #166
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lady Fitzgerald View Post
Still, it isn't the same. And it sure has heck doesn't add to the cost.
What isn't the same? The output file for print vs ebook? No, it's not. But as you say, it doesn't add much to the costs. It can add to cost depending on material. Consider textbooks, that normally have a multi-column layout and things like side-bars and footnotes. The usual way to handle them as ebook files is as a PDF, but that requires a larger screen than most readers have for effective display. (The Amazon Kindle DX in intended to address this use case.) If you want something viewable on a conventional reader, you have to radically redo the design for effective display, and creating two separate designs for print and ebook does add to costs.
______
Dennis

Last edited by DMcCunney; 10-14-2010 at 05:06 PM.
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote