View Single Post
Old 10-13-2010, 09:37 AM   #1
Fabe
Dylanologist
Fabe has survived committing the World's Second Greatest Blunder.Fabe has survived committing the World's Second Greatest Blunder.Fabe has survived committing the World's Second Greatest Blunder.Fabe has survived committing the World's Second Greatest Blunder.Fabe has survived committing the World's Second Greatest Blunder.Fabe has survived committing the World's Second Greatest Blunder.Fabe has survived committing the World's Second Greatest Blunder.Fabe has survived committing the World's Second Greatest Blunder.Fabe has survived committing the World's Second Greatest Blunder.Fabe has survived committing the World's Second Greatest Blunder.Fabe has survived committing the World's Second Greatest Blunder.
 
Fabe's Avatar
 
Posts: 200
Karma: 146754
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
Device: none/all/any
Proper Unicode Declaration

Kaṅkhā-vitaraṇī-purāṇa-ṭīkā and the Kaṅkhā-vitaraṇī-abhinava-ṭīkā

What is the proper Unicode declaration in Sigil to render this line properly?

Neither
<?xml version="1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1"?>
or
<?xml version="1.0 UTF-8"?>
work. Sigil deletes the ISO & UTF designations.

<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../Styles/Stylesheet.css" type="text/css; charset=UTF-8" />
</head>
Seems to have no discernible effect.

I was given this advice from an expert. I do not know how to implement it properly:

"Ideally you should author them with the original diacritics using the
appropriate Unicode character and UTF-8 encoding. If there are
problems viewing the diacritics in a modern web browser then ensure
that you are including the encoding declaration (in XML) and in the
XHTML <meta> element."


As always, I am thankful for everyone's advice. - Fabe
Fabe is offline   Reply With Quote