|
Elfwreck, I believe an employee of the distributor was involved.
Psykhe, it is clear from your terminology ("stolen", "protected", etc.) as well as your points that you are here for the specific purpose of presenting the publishers' case in the DRM situation. We've heard that; we don't need to hear it again. Insisting that you have the right to pick and choose what will be discussed, "calling BS" on things that are well-known, deciding for all of us what effects DRM has and what it doesn't -- and the whole business with the tiny print -- that's not something I expect from a fellow participant in MobileRead. That's what I expect from a publisher's representative, which you increasingly appear to be.
Your statements have gone from disingenuous to insulting. I have stated my position, and stated it very clearly. I cannot see a good reason to further discuss it with you.
|