View Single Post
Old 10-08-2010, 09:41 PM   #83
charleski
Wizard
charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,196
Karma: 1281258
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcey View Post
If the price is much higher then people expect to pay it's viewed as gouging or an insult. Everyone has their own level but you don't want to alienate the majority of your customers.
This is why Apple, with their $5,000 computers, and Louis Vuitton, with their $1000 handbags, are so unpopular...

You seem determined to view expensive goods as a personal insult.


Quote:
Originally Posted by DMcCunney View Post
A lot of the "They had to know" comments about publishers on this thread prompt a "What do you mean by 'they'?" response from me. Most publishers are units of big companies, and employ thousands of people. Assuming that all employees are of the same mind and on the same page is just silly. Often the left hand really doesn't know what the right hand is doing, and sometimes that bites them on the butt.
Meh, I'm not really convinced by that. A modern accounting department should have no trouble keeping track of linked products. They aren't recording their prices on slips of paper, and the failure to maintain parallel pricing windows is sheer incompetence, though I'd accept that part of the responsibility lies with the retailers.
charleski is offline   Reply With Quote