View Single Post
Old 10-08-2010, 01:28 PM   #57
ardeegee
Maratus speciosus butt
ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ardeegee's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,292
Karma: 1162698
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-350
Quote:
Originally Posted by nguirado View Post
If stating the Christian view of sexual morality is the new racism (bigotry), then Christianity is deserving of censure. Christians are the new racists. Pretty clever.
No, stating that Christians have those views isn't bigotry. Stating those views as being true (as the prof did) is bigotry.

And "racism" and "bigotry" are not interchangeable terms. Don't try to equate them for rhetorical purposes.

Racism is:

"a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others."

Bigotry is:

"stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own."

(Both from dictionary.com.)
ardeegee is offline   Reply With Quote