View Single Post
Old 10-08-2010, 10:04 AM   #51
charleski
Wizard
charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,196
Karma: 1281258
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcey View Post
Most consumers don't accept that the publishers have the right to milk new releases for as much as they can get.
Of course they do. The reverse auction model has been in place for almost 50 years and is highly successful.

Quote:
A successful transaction is when both sides are satisfied, it's not when one side gets the absolute most they can and the other side leaves angry.
If you want a hot new book now, you pay more. If you're willing to wait, you pay less. Both sides are satisfied. And the side-effect is that it allows steeper discounts on the low end.

Quote:
Two random anecdotes from my workplace.
Guess what? When 20,000 people are willing to pay $20 for Follett's latest work, the publishers couldn't give a damn about those who think they're entitled to get it for less.
charleski is offline   Reply With Quote